Ethical and Legal Dilemmas in the Age of a Global Pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2022-3-31-37Keywords:
philosophy of law, ethics, metaphysical realism, legal conventionalism, pandemic, civil responsibility, self-isolation, public dialogue, values, legal principlesAbstract
The paper is devoted to the analysis of current trends in the formation of ethical and legal dilemmas in society under the influence of a global pandemic. Based on the consideration of the key arguments characterizing the dominant forms of legal discourse in the modern philosophy of law, the authors justify a number of contradictions that lead to realistic ideas about law and the possibility of direct use in the practice of law enforcement of these empirical sciences. The key social problems and challenges that have developed under the influence of the pandemic are considered, as well as the possibilities of overcoming contradictions between the values of citizens, the need to ensure legal principles and restore an effective dialogue between the authorities and society when applying emergency measures.Downloads
References
Бикс Б. Концептуальные вопросы и юриспруденция // Труды Института государства и права РАН, 2020. Т. 15. № 5. С. 52-73.
Вызовы пандемии и стратегическая повестка дня для общества и государства: социально-политическое положение и демографическая ситуация в 2021 году: монография / В. К. Левашов; отв. ред. В. К. Левашов, Г. В. Осипов, С. В. Рязанцев, Т. К. Ростовская; ФНИСЦ РАН. М.: ФНИСЦ РАН, 2021.
Ромашов Р. А. Интегральная юриспруденция и энциклопедия права: историко-методологический анализ // Правоведение, 2013. № 3 (308). С. 105-120.
Тартаковская И. Н. Доверие перед лицом пандемии: в поисках точки опоры // Социологический журнал, 2021. Т. 27. № 2. С. 68-89.
Тростина М. А., Шишканова К. Н. Народные рассказы о COVID-19 как феномен современного городского фольклора // Уральский исторический вестник, 2021. № 2 (71). С. 177-185.
Харт Г. Л. А. Существуют ли естественные права // Харт Г. Л. А. Философия и язык права. М., Канон+, 2017. С. 116-134.
Argote P., Barham E., Daly S., Gerez J., Marshall J., Pocasangre O. Messages that Increase COVID-19 Vaccine Willingness: Evidence from Online Experiments in Six Latin American Countries (June 28, 2021). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3812023 (дата обращения: 01.02.2022).
Bix B. Law, Language, and Legal Determinacy. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1993.
Daly T. Securing Democracy: Australia's Pandemic Response in Global Context. Melbourne School of Government: Governing During Crises Policy Brief Series. No. 1 (June 3, 2020). URL: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775908 (дата обращения: 02.02.2022).
Himma K. E. Positivism and Interpreting Legal Content: Does Law Call for a Moral Semantics? Ratio Juris. 2009. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 24-43.
Marmor A. Exclusive Legal Positivism. Positive Law and Objective Values. New York, 2001. P. 49-70.
Molly S., Rupali L. Building Trust in Vaccination. Vaccine Reports (2021). Johns Hopkins University. URL: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/vaccines/report/building-trust-in-vaccination (дата обращения: 03.02.2022).
Moore M. S. A Natural Law Theory of Interpretation. Southern California Law Review, 1985. No. 58. P. 277-398.
Moore M. S. The Interpretive Turn in Modern Theory: A Turn for the Worse? Stanford Law Review, 1989. Vol. 41. No. 4. P. 871-957.
