Freedom of Assembly in Poland
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-4-7-14Keywords:
freedom of assembly, notification procedure, responsibility of organizers, spontaneous assembliesAbstract
In the chapter of the book, the author describes the procedure for normative regulation of the organization and holding of assemblies in the Republic of Poland, given that the right to freedom of assembly is enshrined in the Constitution of Poland. The author identifies certain signs and types of assemblies, depending on which a particular assembly is subject to regulation or not. In particular, the issues of holding flash mobs have not been settled. There also remain questions how to determine the boundaries when the personal moral convictions of representatives of the authorities become an obstacle to the exercise of the right to freedom of assembly, or the holding of assemblies is limited with reference to the convictions of most of the society; how to draw the line between peaceful assemblies and assemblies that threaten the safety of people; how to distinguish between spontaneous and scheduled assemblies. Some of these dilemmas are being resolved at the judicial level, but some have yet to be resolved.Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Adam Bodnar. Shaping the Freedom of Assembly: Counter-Productive Effects of the Polish Road towards Illiberal Democracy, in Andras Sajo (ed.), Free to Protest: Constituent Power and Street Demonstration. Utrecht: Eleven International Publishing, 2008. P. 165-187.
Agnieszka Graff. We Are (Not All) Homophobes: A Report from Poland, Feminist Studies, 2006. No. 32 (2). P. 434-449, 436.
Anna Gruszczynska. Living La Vida Internet. Some Notes on the Cyberization of Polish LGBT Community, in R. Kuhar and J. Takacs (eds.), Beyond the Pink Curtain: Everyday Life of LGBT People in Eastern Europe. Peace Institute, 2006. P. 95-115.
Downloads
Published
2021-07-15
Issue
Section
Articles
How to Cite
Moulin-Stożek M. Freedom of Assembly in Poland // Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence. 2021. no. 4. P. 7–14. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-4-7-14