On the Issue of Pre-Contractual Liability Qualification

Authors

  • L.V. Shvarts Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (North-West Institute of Management of RANEPA) Автор
  • E.S. Deriabina Moscow State University named after M. V. Lomonosov Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-3-36-41

Keywords:

copyright, literary work, legally significant elements of a literary work, protected form, unprotected content

Abstract

The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the protectability of literary works and their components, expressed in the application of the doctrine of the protected form and unprotected content of a literary work as the main concept in domestic legislation and judicial practice. Within the framework of this article, the distinguished legally significant elements under Russian law, the criteria for their protection are analyzed. The author analyzes the influence of the teachings of I. G. Fichte on the protected form and unprotected content on the provisions of legislative acts regulating copyright protection, as well as cases of granting legal protection based on the criterion of the author’s creative work, for example, in relation to such elements of a literary work as the name and character.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Гаврилов Э. П. Оригинальность как критерий охраны объектов авторским правом. Патенты и лицензии, 2004. № 6. С. 45-51.

Горбунов А. А. Проблема установления свойств не охраняемых авторским правом идей в контексте развития культуры. Ex jure. 2020. № 3. С. 64-80.

Комментарий к части четвертой Гражданского кодекса Российской Федерации (поглавный). Под ред. А. Л. Маковского. М.: Статут, 2008. 225 с.

Рахмилович А. В. Название произведения как объект авторского права. Журнал российского права. 2002. № 11. С. 25-29.

Сергеев А. П. Право интеллектуальной собственности в Российской Федерации: учебник. 2-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: ООО "ТК Велбн". 752 с.

Серебровский В. И. Вопросы советского авторского права. Отв. ред. П. Е. Орловский. М.: Изд-во АН СССР. 1956. 283 с.

Fichte J. Beweis der Unrechtmäßigkeit des Büchernachdrucks. Berliner Monatsschrift. 1793. S. 443-482. URL: http://copy.law.cam.ac.uk/cam/tools/request/showRecord.php?id=record_d_1793 (дата обращения: 15.05.2021).

Sprigman Christopher Jon. Copyright and the Rule of Reason (May 5, 2009). Journal on Telecommunications & High Technology Law. Vol. 7, 2009. Virginia Law and Economics Research Paper No. 2009-03. URL: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1399522 (дата обращения: 15.05.2021).

Downloads

Published

2021-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shvarts L., Deriabina E. On the Issue of Pre-Contractual Liability Qualification // Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence. 2021. no. 3. P. 36–41. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2021-3-36-41