The System of Legal Communication: An Emergent Reality
Keywords:
emergence of law, law-genesis, normativity of consciousness, sources of obligatoriness, communicative theory of law, dialogical concept of law, three-dimensional concept of law, meta-theory of legal techniqueAbstract
Introduction. The paradigm prevailing in domestic science, which defines the system of law through its internal structure (norms → institutions → branches), is based on terminological confusion. From the perspective of general systems theory: Structure is the internal form of a phenomenon, a stable configuration of connections between its parts. A System is a delimited set of interacting elements forming a new quality and integrity. Consequently, a legal norm, being itself a complex formation (hypothesis, disposition, sanction), cannot be the primary element of the legal system. A deeper, ontological basis needs to be identified.Methodology and materials. The methodological foundation of the research is a synthesis of domestic communicative-dialogical approaches (A. V. Polyakov, I. L. Chestnov), the model of the threedimensional concept of law (S. S. Alekseev), and the meta-theory of legal technique (M. L. Davydova). The study proposes a paradigmatic shift in the understanding of law through the concept of law as an emergent reality.Results and Discussion. As an alternative, a triatomic model of the legal system is proposed, where the primary elements are: 1) scopes of rights and obligations as the substance of regulation, 2) sources of obligatoriness as the driving force, and 3) normativity of consciousness as the environment for the existence of law. Law emerges at the point of intense interaction among three ontological elements: scopes of rights/obligations, sources of obligatoriness, and normativity of consciousness. The normativity of consciousness acts as a catalyst for law-genesis, transforming static structures into a living legal reality.Conclusions. Legal reality cannot be reduced to the sum of its elements - it emerges as a new quality when a critical mass of interaction among scopes of rights, sources of obligatoriness, and normativity of consciousness is achieved. This emergent property explains why law is simultaneously objective and subjective, stable and dynamic. Law is an emergent phenomenon.Downloads
References
Алексеев С. С. Общая теория права: в 2 т. Т. 1. М.: Юридическая литература, 1981. 360 с. EDN: RLSTQD
Алексеев С. С. Общая теория права: в 2 т. Т. 2. М.: Юридическая литература, 1982. 360 с. EDN: RLSTQN
Давыдова М. Л. Юридическая техника: проблемы теории и методологии. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2009. 317 с. EDN: QRDKKX
Давыдова М. Л. Нормативно-правовое предписание. Природа, типология, технико-юридическое оформление. СПб.: Юридический центр — Пресс, 2010. 224 с. EDN: SUEUJX
Поляков А. В. Общая теория права. Проблемы интерпретации в контексте коммуникативного подхода. СПб.: СПбГУ, 2004. 863 с.
Поляков А. В. Принцип взаимного правового признания: российская философско-правовая традиция и коммуникативный подход к праву // Труды Института государства и права Российской академии наук. 2021. Т. 16, № 6. С. 39–101. DOI: 10.35427/2073-4522-2021-16-6-polyakov. EDN: AQDOOD
Честнов И. Л. Постклассическая теория права / Академия Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации, Санкт-Петербургский юридический институт (филиал) Академии Генеральной прокуратуры Российской Федерации. СПб.: Алеф-Пресс, 2012. 649 с. EDN: QSSDIV
Честнов И. Л. Конструктивистская парадигма в юриспруденции // Известия высших учебных заведений. Правоведение. 2016. № 2 (325).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Zykov D.V.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.