The Legal Rationale for Prodigality as a Reason for an Adult to Be Placed Under Guardianship

Authors

  • K.B. Priambudi Brawijaya University Автор
  • A.R. Budiono Brawijaya University Автор
  • A. Kusumadara Brawijaya University Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/3034-2813-2025-5-8-19

Keywords:

prodigality, guardianship, Law in Indonesia, Civil Code of Indonesia

Abstract

Relevance. This study examines the legal rationale for prodigality as a basis for placing an adult under guardianship under Article 433 of the Indonesian Civil Code. The issue of prodigality raises concerns regarding financial mismanagement, potential harm to the individual, and legal safeguards to prevent economic instability. The research aims to explore the legal foundation of prodigality and identify the criteria for determining whether an adult should be placed under guardianship due to financial irresponsibility.Methods and Methodology. This study employs a normative legal research approach, analyzing legal documents, statutory regulations, and judicial decisions related to prodigality in Indonesia. A doctrinal approach is utilized to examine the interpretation and application of Article 433 of the Civil Code, considering legal principles and case law that establish guidelines for guardianship decisions.Results. The findings indicate that prodigality, as regulated under Article 433 of the Indonesian Civil Code, serves as a legal ground for placing individuals under guardianship. Courts assess financial mismanagement, the potential for significant economic losses, the presence of mental or physical disorders, and expert opinions to determine an individual's financial competence. Judicial considerations focus on preventing further financial harm and ensuring economic stability through a court-appointed guardian. The study also highlights that Indonesian courts adopt a protective legal framework to balance personal autonomy and financial security.Conclusion and Discussion. Article 433 of the Civil Code provides a legal safeguard to protect individuals from financial ruin due to prodigality. The application of guardianship involves a comprehensive assessment of financial behavior, mental health conditions, and expert evaluations. The study emphasizes the importance of judicial discretion in ensuring that guardianship mechanisms serve as a means of financial protection while respecting individual rights. Future research may explore comparative legal perspectives on prodigality and guardianship in different jurisdictions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • K.B. Priambudi, Brawijaya University

    Kevin Bramustiko Priambudi, student of the Faculty of Law

    Malang

  • A.R. Budiono, Brawijaya University

    Abdul Rachmad Budiono, lecturer at Faculty of Law, professor

    Malang

  • A. Kusumadara, Brawijaya University

    Afifah Kusumadara, lecturer at Faculty of Law, professor

    Malang

References

Badriyah, S. M. (2011). Penemuan Hukum (Rechtsvinding) dan Penciptaan Hukum (Rechtsschepping) oleh Hakim Untuk Mewujudkan Keadilan. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 40 (3), Article 3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/mmh.40.3.2011.384-392

Bofill, H. L. (2021). Law, Violence and Constituent Power: The Law, Politics and History of Constitution Making (1st ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003054801

Burgers, L., Staal, T. (2019). Climate Action as Positive Human Rights Obligation: The Appeals Judgment in Urgenda v the Netherlands. In J. E. Nijman & W. G. Werner (Eds.), Netherlands Yearbook of International Law 2018 (Vol. 49, pp. 223–244). T.M.C. Asser Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-331-3_10

Caplan, G. (Ed.) (2013) An Approach to Community Mental Health (0 ed.). Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315013879

Cheng, M., Edwards, D., Darcy, S., Redfern, K. (2018) A Tri-Method Approach to a Review of Adventure Tourism Literature: Bibliometric Analysis, Content Analysis, and a Quantitative Systematic Literature Review. Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research, 42 (6), 997–1020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1096348016640588

Firdaus, M. I. (2023). The Legalization of Interfaith Marriage in Indonesia (Between Universalism and Cultural Relativism). The Easta Journal Law and Human Rights, 1 (02), 64–72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.58812/eslhr.v1i02.52

Hamidi, J. (2016). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Disabilitas dalam Memenuhi Hak Mendapatkan Pendidikan dan Pekerjaan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23 (4), 652–671. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss4.art7

Irwansyah, I. (2020) Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel. Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media, 8.

Lestari, A. Y., Heriyani, E. (2009) Dasar-Dasar Pembuatan Kontrak dan Aqad.

Lev, D. S. (1962) The Supreme Court and adat inheritance law in Indonesia. Am. J. Comp. L., 11, 205.

Luthan, S. (2007) Hubungan Hukum dan Kekuasaan. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14 (2), 166–184. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol14.iss2.art4

Mangku, D. G. S., Rai Yuliartini, N. P., & Lasmawan, I. W. (2022) Legal Protection for People with Disabilities in Indonesia in the Perspective of Justice Theory. Unnes Law Journal, 8 (2), 245–262. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15294/ulj.v8i2.52406

Marzuki, M. (2017) Penelitian Hukum: Edisi Revisi. Prenada Media.

Mousourakis, G. (2015) Roman Law and the Origins of the Civil Law Tradition. Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12268-7

Muqoddas, B. (2002) Mengkritisi Asas-asas Hukum Acara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 19 (20), 18–31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol9.iss20.art2

Permatasari, S. (2023) Pemaknaan frasa pasal 433 kuhperdata dikaitkan dengan pengertian disabilitas dalam uu nomor 8 tahun 2016 tentang penyandang disabilitas terhadap kecakapan bertindak dalam perjanjian.

Salverda, R. (2009) Doing Justice in a Plural Society: A Postcolonial Perspective on Dutch Law and Other Legal Traditions in the Indonesian Archipelago, 1600–Present. Dutch Crossing, 33 (2), 152–170. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1179/155909009X461939

Simanjuntak, P. N. H. (2008) Pokok-pokok hukum perdata Indonesia. Djambatan.

Van Engeland, A. (2022) Human Rights: Between Universalism and Relativism. In S. Sayapin, R. Atadjanov, U. Kadam, G. Kemp, N. Zambrana-Tévar, N. Quénivet (Eds.), International Conflict and Security Law, pp. 93–113. T.M.C. Asser Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-515-7_5

Villa-Rosas, G. (2023) Merkl’s Stufenbaulehre in the History of the Theory of Legal Power. In G. Villa-Rosas & T. Spaak (Eds.), Legal Power and Legal Competence (Vol. 140, pp. 289–303). Springer International Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-28555-4_14

Windajani, I. I. D. (2008) Pelaksanaan hak dan kewajiban perdata orang yang tidak cakap hukum di kabupaten sleman. Mimbar Hukum — Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 20 (3), 559 p. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16296

Zuhdi, A., Kamula, A. A. (2024) Legitimasi Hukum Asing Sebagai Pertimbangan Putusan oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia dan Afrika Selatan. Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang, 7 (2), pp. 272–296. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i2.21634

Downloads

Published

2025-01-15

Issue

No. 1 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Priambudi K.B., Budiono A.R., Kusumadara A.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Priambudi K., Budiono A., Kusumadara A. The Legal Rationale for Prodigality as a Reason for an Adult to Be Placed Under Guardianship // Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence. 2025. no. 1. P. 8–19. https://doi.org/10.22394/3034-2813-2025-5-8-19