Abuse of Law in International Arbitration

Authors

  • D.M. Maksimov National Research University Higher School of Economics Автор
  • P.K. Pakshin National Research University Higher School of Economics Автор

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-73-82

Keywords:

abuse of law, international commercial arbitration, international investment arbitration, arbitration process, dispute resolution

Abstract

The article deals with the phenomenon of abuse of law in international arbitration that seems to be an extremely relevant subject for study due to the development of transnational economic relations. At the same time, various types of abuse in arbitration make us think about developing a certain classification of all cases of abuse of law. The purpose of this article is to comprehensively consider the types of abuse of law in international arbitration and the prospects for countering such abuses, as well as to develop a theoretical basis for such countering based on world experience. In this study, the delay in the process, challenging the competence of arbitration, abuse of information disclosure and exchange of documents, the transfer of the assets of debtor to affiliates or third parties, a fraudulent application for bankruptcy of the debtor, as well as lies to arbitrators and fake evidence were considered. At the same time, the article notes the problem of the lack of mandatory ethical standards in international arbitration and the insufficient powers of arbitrators in the process. The authors conclude that it is necessary to continue work on ethical codes of conduct. In addition, it is concluded that it is necessary to apply liability measures and “procedural sanctions”. In this regard, we are ready for regulatory changes and the implementation of the “ethical review”, that is necessary for positive changes in arbitration.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • D.M. Maksimov, National Research University Higher School of Economics

    Dmitry M. Maksimov, Deputy Director of the School of Legal Regulation of Business of the Faculty of Law

    Moskow

  • P.K. Pakshin, National Research University Higher School of Economics

    Pavel K. Pakshin, Directorate for Scientific Projects

    Moskow

References

Асосков А. В. Комментарий к Правилам о беспристрастности и независимости третейских судей, утвержденным Торгово-промышленной палатой Российской Федерации // Вестник международного коммерческого арбитража. 2011. № 1 (3). С. 142–171. EDN: XPHWLZ

Бергманн В. Гражданское процессуальное уложение Германии / В. Бергманн. М.: Инфотроп Медиа, 2016. 388 с.

Бердова И. А. Злоупотребление процессуальными правами в гражданском судопроизводстве / И. А. Бердова, И. В. Гинзбург // Мир науки и образования. 2017. № 2 (10). С. 2. EDN: ZHNLAD

Бугаевский А. А. Ложь въ гражданскомъ судѣ // Право: еженедѣльная юридическая газета. 1909. № 12. С. 733–742.

Гребельский А. Свидетельские показания в международном коммерческом арбитраже // Хозяйство и право. 2015. № 10 (465). С. 73–86. EDN: UWONJB

Молчанов В. В. Об ответственности в гражданском судопроизводстве / В. В. Молчанов // Арбитражный и гражданский процесс. 2010. № 10. С. 28–31. EDN: NCYJAL

Очирова С. Непредвзятость арбитров в международном коммерческом арбитраже: подходы к оценке // Международное правосудие. 2018. № 1 (25). С. 122–137. DOI: 10.21128/2226-2059-2018-1-122-134. EDN: YVTLAB

Султанов А. Р. Ложь, добросовестность в гражданском праве и процессе // Евразийская адвокатура. 2019. № 5 (42). С. 62–66. EDN: SHHGUH

Ahuja N. G. (2022) Mechanisms to Control Guerrilla Tactics in International Arbitration. Springer Nature. Pp. 177–221.

Bishop R. D. (2011) Advocacy and Ethics in International Arbitration: Ethics in International Arbitration. Arbitration Advocacy in Changing Times. ICCA Congress Series. No. 15, pp. 383–390.

Born G. B. (2014) International Commercial Arbitration. 2nd ed. Alphen aan den Rijn: Kluwer Law International. 1775 p.

Gautam O., Sen, S. (2020) Guerilla Tactics in International Arbitration: Use of Party-Appointed Experts. Manupatra. Pp. 1–2.

Park W. W. (2001) Arbitration’s Discontents. Arbitration International. No. 17 (3), pp. 263–274. DOI: 10.1023/a:1011234817625

Rogers C. A. (2013) Guerilla Tactics and Ethical Regulation. Kluwer International, Penn State Law Research Paper. No. 23. URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2260568 (date of access: 07.02.2024).

Sussman E., Ebere S. (2011) All’s fair in love and war — or is it? Reflections on ethical standards for counsel in international arbitration. The American Review of International Arbitration. No. 7 (2), pp. 611–623.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Maksimov D., Pakshin P. Abuse of Law in International Arbitration // Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence. 2024. no. 2. P. 73–82. https://doi.org/10.22394/2686-7834-2024-2-73-82