Legal Analysis of the Specifics of Implementing the Principle of Popular Sovereignty in a Federal State

Authors

  • O.O. Zatsepa St. Petersburg Electoral Commission Автор

Keywords:

popular sovereignty, federalism, state power, federal state, democracy, mechanism of democracy

Abstract

Introduction. The issue of popular sovereignty is key in the theory of state and law, particularly in the context of federal structures. Federalism is a multi-level system of public authority with a distribution of powers between federal and regional institutions, which raises complex issues of delimitation of power and the legitimization of it’s intsitutions. In Russia, this topic is particularly important due to the historical specifics and diversity of regional practices, as well as the search for a balance between the unity of the state and the autonomy of its constituent entities.Methodology and materials. The research is based on an analysis of constitutional norms, judicial practice, scientific approaches to federalism, as well as historical and legal analysis of various models of the realization of national sovereignty in federal states. The materials used are regulatory legal acts of the federal level, judicial acts of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation, regional legislation and scientific works of domestic authors, including those analyzing legal regulation and law enforcement practice of foreign countries, which allowed us to consider the problem from a multifaceted theoretical and historical perspective.Research results. The complexity and versatility of federal relations are revealed, characterized by the need for strict observance of the principle of unity of state sovereignty while maintaining a certain independence of the subjects of the federation. The article reveals the specifics of the mechanism for the implementation of democracy and the stages of its transformation in Russia, including the complex mechanism of legitimization of regional authorities. The author proves that sovereignty is indivisible and belongs to a single source of power - the people, despite regional peculiarities and variability of federalism models.Conclusions. The federal system requires balanced and adaptive legal models for the implementation of popular sovereignty, ensuring the unity of statehood and the autonomy of the subjects. In Russia, as a result of long-term and at the same time dynamic legislative reforms, a unique model of federalism has emerged, implying the possibility of using two different ways of legitimizing executive power at the regional level which are equivalent from the point of view of ensuring national sovereignty. The indivisibility of the sovereignty of the people as a single bearer of State power remains the fundamental basis for the sustainable functioning of the federal State and the prevention of fragmentation of the political space.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • O.O. Zatsepa, St. Petersburg Electoral Commission

    Oleg O. Zatsepa, Deputy Chairman

    Saint Petersburg

References

Авакьян С. А. Федерализм и местное самоуправление как институты российского народовластия. М.: ИД Юриспруденция, 2005. 256 с. / Авакьян С. А., Сергеев А. А. // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2005. № 3. С. 46-48. EDN: OJFUJR

Бойко Ю. П. Конфедеративные истоки федерализма // История государства и права. 2008. № 22. С. 2–4. EDN: KCKECB

Бородин В. В. Россия как федерация: принципы и соответствие / Бородин В. В., Смольяков А. А. // Социология и право. 2025. Т. 17, № 2. С. 222–228. DOI 10.35854/2219-6242-2025-2-222-228. EDN: KDIRHC

Зацепа О. О. Некоторые аспекты реализации народного суверенитета в федеративном государстве: мировой и российский опыт // Ленинградский юридический журнал. 2010. № 3 (21). С. 189–197. EDN: OMRRWR

Ивайловский Д. А. К вопросу о новом этапе развития российского федерализма // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2006. № 6. С. 34–39. EDN: KXZITJ

Кистринова О. В. Перспективы развития федерализма в России // Право и политика. 2007. № 6. С. 32–37. EDN: HZSNSD

Новоселова-Чурсина Е. С. Принципы федерализма в решениях Конституционного Суда Российской Федерации // Конституционное и муниципальное право. 2007. № 3. С. 35–39. EDN: JXXNSD

Фарукшин А. М. Проблемы федеративных отношений в решениях конституционных судов // Журнал российского права. 2007. № 8 (128). С. 70–83. EDN: OOACVX

Федерализм: теория, институты, отношения (сравнительно-правовое исследование) / А. С. Автономов, И. Ю. Богдановская, Т. А. Васильева [и др.]. М.: Юристъ, 2001. 376 с. EDN: YLBDHN

Черепанов В. А. Конституционный Суд РФ о реформе государственной власти в субъектах РФ // Государственная власть и местное самоуправление. 2006. № 5. С. 17–22. EDN: KXMSTH

Черепанов В. А. О народовластии в России: продолжение дискуссии // Государство и право. 2014. № 1. С. 36–44. EDN: RYEDJR

Чиркин В. Е. Публичная власть в современном обществе // Журнал российского права. 2009. № 7(151). С. 3–13. EDN: LDLTJL.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-15

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zatsepa O. Legal Analysis of the Specifics of Implementing the Principle of Popular Sovereignty in a Federal State // Theoretical and Applied Jurisprudence. 2025. no. 4. P. 91–101.